Suppose a stack 𝕊 and a set of functions ℱ that operate thereon—poping ofvalues for use as inputs, and putting back on as corresponding outputs. Supposefurther that ℱ, among other functions, contains those listed in Listing 1.:ₙ⊟⇡⧻⌊⌵≡duplicateflippowercouplerangeshapefloorabsmapListing 1: A few of the functions in ℱEach a conscice incantation, performed on the arbitrarily many dimensions ofan input. Lastly, recall that an 𝑛×𝑛 Gaussian kernel can be constructed usingthe Radial Basis Function in Eq. 1𝐾𝑖,𝑗=exp(−(𝑖−𝑗)22𝜎2)(1)where 𝑖,𝑗 are indices of the kernel relative to its center, which, using the usingthe functions in Listing 1 can be expressed as per Listing 2R ← ⁿ : e ¯ ÷ × 2 ⁿ 2 : √ / + ⁿ 2 ⌵G ← ≡ ₁ R ⌵ - ⌊ ÷ 2 ⊸ ⧻ ⇡ ⊟ . : ₙ e .D ← ÷ ⊸ ( / ↥ / ↥ ) √ ⌵ - ⊸ ↻ 1Listing 2: Radial basis function (top), Gaussian kernel function (middle), anddiscrete two dimensional derivative function (bottom)The code G 512 and D G 512, thus genertaes the left and right subplots ofFigure 1 respectivelyFigure 1: A Gaussian kernel (left) and its associated derivative (right)For the scientifically inclined, these Gaussian gradients might bring to mindthe notion of orbitals, and probability density functions (indeed that is in factwhat a Gaussian is). However—and perhaps more something-somethingly—therelationship between Listing 2 and Figure 1 is of an Asemic nature, echoingworks like the Codex Seraphinianus [1]. To put it bluntly, Uiua’s—the languageof which we speak—is rivavled in its inscruitability only by its expressiveness,which is to say very.The artifacts produced—kernels, gradients, figures—are legible to those initiated in scientific the hypthetical scientific ritual to which they could havebelonged, and yet the code that conjures them echoes the inscrutable glyphsof the Codex Seraphinianus, where language teeters on the edge aesthtics, butquite far from meaning.REFERENCES[1]L. Serafini, Codex Seraphinianus. 2. Milano: Ricci, 1983.